Sunday, December 7, 2014

Janus Justice

Madame and Readers:

It’s hard for things to get traction during the holiday season, but maybe, MAYBE the outrage over the lack of indictment in the Eric Garner case might be the thing to do it.

If white denialism can be overcome.

Because the man who filmed Eric Garner’s extrajudicial execution on camera, who with it recorded the 11 times he gasped out “I can’t breathe,” was indicted by the local prosecutor on trumped up relatively minor charges.  The grand jury in that instance found probable cause to indict based almost solely on the testimony of two police officers.

But a grand jury couldn’t find probable cause to indict the officer who performed the prohibited, murderous choke hold that would kill Eric Garner, even though it was entirely on video for anyone to see.

And still too many whites want to say Garner shouldn’t have, quote, “resisted arrest,” when it was obvious the only thing he might have “resisted” (feebly) was being choked to death by a cowardly and arrogant cop while the cop’s fellows joined in.

All for a “crime” that would be pathetically laughable if it wasn’t so tragic.

And Tamir Rice, 12 years old, was in a park with a bb gun, and someone called the police to say that they were nervous that he was in the park with a toy gun.  So even though the police knew it wasn’t real, they only gave the boy 2 seconds to comply with their hastily shouted commands as they burst on the scene—and then shot him dead.

The Washington Post had an article that included this telling reminder of how much safer things are for whites when police confront them: "Under the Twitter hashtag #CrimingWhileWhite, white people have been relating their stories of doing things like speeding, being drunk in public, mouthing off to cops, and even more serious acts, all of which got them sent home by friendly and accommodating officers, when black people doing the same things would have likely been treated much more harshly."

The Post tries to convey white privilege to those who are so embedded in it they cannot see the forest they live in:  "Your privilege lies in the absence of mistreatment, which is easy to ignore since it just feels like the way everyone should be able to proceed through their life."

Even a number of conservatives are beginning to realize that if we continue to have a justice system for one group, and arbitrary oppression and death for another, we won’t be ourselves anymore, that we will be only like the murderous police-states we have so harshly condemned.


For it is not just what oppression does to the oppressed, but what it does to the oppressor.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have read most of the testimony from witnesses. There is conflicting evidence about whether Brown's hands were actually up...no one can ever hear Brown say anything at this point. Each witness does not dispute that Brown attacked the police officer...there is agreement on this issue. In addition, the toxicology reports about Brown indicate that he was impaired due to Marijuana use which means he was not in his right mind during this incident. This could explain why he did not respond to the officer's requests. It is also clear that Brown did not listen to the police's request to stop. The bottom line is this: Brown committed a crime when he robbed and attacked the shop owner, did not listen to the police and resisted arrest. If Brown had not been under the influence of drugs, not committed the robbery, not attacked the shop owner and had actually listened to the police officer then he would still be alive today. I have noted the biased langue on the papers stated that Brown and his friend being in the middle of the street was an act of dignity on their part. I don't believe walking down the middle of a busy city street has anything to do with a person's dignity. Overall, I believe the article was biased, although it did bring up some good points.

ProfessorJ said...

Thank you for the response. 4 questions for now:

1. Did you read all the Ferguson posts I made prior to this one?

2. Are you aware that marijuana use makes one the opposite of aggressive?

3. All evidence points to the streets being nearly deserted of vehicle traffic at the time the pair where walking, and this is not uncommon in a small town on a relative side street.

4. Why the focus of your comments on only a few selective points? To dispute a comprehensive treatment (the posts in toto) would need to require comprehensive addressing in return so as not to mislead or distort, wouldn't you agree?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...