Madame M:
Little stomach turning in Oil! In fact, it takes about 100 pages before you
get hooked, because the pattern (and the points) don’t begin to become clear
until about then. Or maybe my cerebral
fluid was a moving a bit slow when I read it, lol.
Education has become a servant of
money. School districts have banners in
their gymnasiums that read “Coca-Cola (or Pepsi-Cola, or any of a number of
corporate purveyors of non-nutrition) is THE (my emphasis added) proud sponsor
of the X School District.” (And for those
who think this is not a general phenomenon outside education: How many corporate named things in/on PUBLIC
buildings (or even the buildings themselves) are there if you think about it,
let alone campus ones?)
Kow-towed college and university
teachers are increasingly powerless cogs in the corporatized machine. Their administrators are like politicians,
who spend anywhere between 1/3 and 2/3rds of every typical day having to raise
money (and we wonder why they don’t get any of OUR business done, assuming they
would even want to do OUR business)—college officials have to keep the money
coming in, along with the prestige, attention, “modernization,” and other
aspects of the corporatization of education. The supposed goal of EDUCATION takes a dim,
name-only backseat (WAY in the back) of the education bus to moneysville. Places around the country differ from Penn
State only perhaps in specifics, not in underlying causes.
Socialized to obey? Of course! It’s not JUST that students are
processed instead of educated, or that their curiosity is stunted, or that
their critical thinking skills are undeveloped.
Teachers complain that “students don’t ask questions,” but when you have
a culture and a system that discourages doing so (or at times even makes it
irrelevant!), it shouldn’t be so surprising to those teachers.
Yes, Madame, yes! Your paragraph on the humanities should be
pasted on the front cover of every humanities textbook in the country! Here’s a star of the humanities with words to
emphasize your point: “We begin to die
when we are silent about the things we believe in.” Martin Luther King Jr.
Education has become, like many
things in this society, about manipulation.
The test-prep business is instructive (pun intended). It’s all about the APPEARANCE. Manipulate the process to make it to the next
step. Hedges found that out when he was
having his son prepare for standardized testing. “The tutor told my son things like ‘stop
thinking about whether the passage is true.
You are wasting your time thinking about the ideas. Just spit back what they tell you.’” (101) It worked, proving that those who can
afford tutors and other manipulators (such as daddy donors who can make big
contributions and so can get their kid’s application skid-greased) get the
“elite” education.
But as Hedges says, it merely fills
these “elite” (yes, I’m increasingly choking on the word) classrooms with large
numbers of drones. And yet these drones will go off to Wall
Street or Corporate America/World upon graduation, many with beginning salaries
of $120,000 or more. Did they earn these
salaries by truly being exceedingly keen and proficient? No, Hedges says, they merely showed they
could do large amounts of work (regardless of whether it was meaningful or
insightful, which it probably wasn’t, and with no real evaluation of results)
and faithfully regurgitate information.
They have little recognition of, or regard for, concepts and systemic
effects. Their intelligence and
proficiencies are narrow and selective. They
cannot see (indeed, probably have little ability to do so) themselves as they
truly are, or their culture as it truly is.
They swim in narrow currents in their minds—currents that deal largely
only with their personal situations and those of their immediate families, plus
the problems and opportunities of their business “profession.” “They do not see their own biases” and “are
blind to the gaping inadequacies in our economic, social, and political
structures and do not grasp that these structures, which they have been taught
to serve, must be radically modified or even abolished to stave off disaster.” (102-103)
Social intelligence, emotional intelligence, moral balance, true creative
ability: all stunted. This culture
determines worth—both business and institutional—by wealth. It’s all about winning (and especially winning
monetarily), with no thought of (or concern for) the cost to other individuals,
or to the society.
Pointing out the exceptions to the
above only serves to prove the rule.
Students who want something
different find themselves feeling like freaks, and the isolated feeling is
reinforced by the system. The decay in
the culture has left them with fewer places and people where they can hear and
discuss big questions. Largely gone are
the days of discussing those questions in church groups. And literary societies and debating clubs of
the kind produced in scenarios like Dead Poets Society are no longer vibrant on
most campuses, and many are effectively coma-like. That the Humanities are so disparaged (“what
can you do with that? Worthless!”) is
evidenced by the stat that only 8 percent of graduates now choose to attain
such degrees. (108)
"Frank Donoghue, the author of The Last Professors: The Corporate
University and the Fate of the Humanities, writes that liberal arts
education has been systematically dismantled for decades. Any form of learning not strictly vocational
has at best been marginalized and in many schools abolished. Students are steered away from asking the
broad, disturbing questions that challenge the assumptions of the power
elite. They do not know how to
interrogate or examine the economic system that serves the corporate
state." (108-109) As Hedges says, this includes many students who are
otherwise very bright, and these go on to work for their unexamined corporate
masters.
The list is long about why the Humanities are so
important. Hedges has given us one
reminder, from Matthew Arnold’s piece of 1869: “’the best that has been thought
and said,’ would provide standards to resist the errors and corruptions of contemporary
life…But Arnold’s eloquent defense of knowledge for its sake, as a way to ask
the broad moral and social questions, has been shredded and destroyed. Most universities have become high-priced
occupational training centers. Students
seek tangible vocational credentials.” (109)
This credentialism has become so intense that it often becomes THE
objective of everything connected with “education.” Actual functional ability
(and let’s completely forget about knowledge, awareness, or conceptual understanding)
becomes nearly irrelevant.
The corporate capitalists that directly or
indirectly run most everything convert all to the bottom line of “profit” and
usefulness to business. This, Hedges
says, creates an anti-intellectualism, a distrust of intellectual inquiry. “And
as small, liberal arts schools have folded—at least 200 since 1990—they have
been replaced with corporate, for-profit universities. There are now some forty-five colleges and
universities listed on the NYSE or the NASDAQ.
The University of Phoenix, the largest for-profit school with some
300,000 students, proudly calls itself on its Web site: ‘Your corporate
university.’ The only mission undertaken
by for-profit universities, and increasingly non-profit universities, is job
training. And as universities become
glorified vocational schools for the corporations, they adopt values and
operating techniques of the corporations they serve. It may be more cost-effective to replace
tenured faculty with adjuncts and whittle down or shutter departments like
French or history that do not feed vocational aspirations, but it decimates the
possibility of a broad education that permits students to question the
assumptions of a decaying culture, reach out beyond our borders, and chart new
alternatives and directions.” (110)
When money becomes everything, when Mammon sets
the effective curriculums and effective paths, education is transformed into a
processing function to churn out unquestioning systems managers—and make
maximum money doing so. The frenzied
pace of society, along with credentialism, then leads to more demand for online
classes, as they cost the least and are the most profitable (one reason because
they can draw from a wide geographic area).
These online classes are rarely evaluated for true results, because the
results would often be glaringly bleak, and besides, nothing must get in the
way of profit. Online classes are what
people want, because they need a “convenient” way to get a degree, and
institutions want to “give them what they want,” primarily because the classes
are so profitable. Sure, there are
exceptional classes and exceptional instructors, but most online courses are
sub-par at best. They give the illusion
of education, and the customer and the provider are largely happy with that
illusion. They may not quite be degree
mills (yet), but they are on the road.
American education has prided itself on being
much vaunted and much desired around the world.
The growing elements of illusion described above are reducing that. For example, German high school exchange
students coming to America essentially give up a year of their education in
coming here—American education is held in such low regard, that a student must
take the year over upon returning to Germany.
Even many college bound students are electing to decline opportunities
to come here and instead choose to go to college/university in their home
country.
Because although it doesn’t have to be that way,
“American greatness” that politicians and their rabid followers like to thump
their chests about is increasingly a hollow façade.
No comments:
Post a Comment