My Dear Professor J,  
I am NOT ready to put this thread "to bed" just because I brought up  the Oscar Wilde letters, and you are more than welcome to join me in my  "One More Thing throne room." I am now imagining said throne and ornate  room where I can continuously bore people with just the extra odd bit of  information. Complicated locks and trap doors may be in order! LOL
 I  am a dreadful book snooper. There. I've confessed. It is very revealing  and not just because I think I may get stuck there and have nothing to  read. The presence of large amounts of books points at the very least to  the curiosity of the resident. A mass of a particular genre hints at  interests. But in the home of a real book lover where much is read, I  always think "Of all they've read, these are the books they chose to keep."  The volumes taking up precious space in the home of a voracious reader  are particularly telling. Treasures that simply cannot be parted  with. Paper and ink windows to the soul.
A second  reading provided a few insights into just how cleverly the book is  written. Sydney cutting the letter short to dress for dinner not only  was a sign of the times when people of a certain element of society  dressed for dinner, but I thought it was also among the first clues to  his sexual orientation. Straight men rarely talk of "dressing" for  anything. And of course as you point out the letter writing is something  lost to us along with the idea of any kind of communal dinner at the  end of every day. The evening's reconnection has been lost to  over-scheduling and for families to work, sports, and other activities  that cause the evening meal to be eaten in sort of an uncivilized "wave"  as family members make pit stops to refuel. Ah, but this is a mother  complaining about a losing battle she fought for years. 
I am so glad  to hear you gush over this book. Like you, I found myself not wanting  to finish it. The stories in many cases read as the real recollections  of someone. Margaret Mitchell's details to a large extent in Gone With  the Wind were from stories that she had heard first hand at family  gatherings when she was growing up. I couldn't help thinking that much  of the feeling of authenticity of our Guernsey friends was due to the  same thing, though in the interviews I read they spoke often of  extensive research.  
"I wonder how the book got to  Guernsey? Perhaps there is some secret sort of homing instinct in books  that brings them to their perfect readers." Is a literary conspiracy  afoot? I'd like to think so. How lovely to think that the universe is  twirling events, meetings, discoveries in such a way as to bring the  perfect books and people to us and taking us to the places where we can  find them. Think of all that never would have happened if that book  hadn't shown up!  
Authors of books set something loose  in the world, the results of which they can never know. A kind of  immortal influence that persists after they are gone and permeates  whatever place their work can be taken. In the case of the Literary  Society the result is the holding together of individuals and community  by those kind enough (or driven) to leave their thoughts (in words) for  others.
Of all the wonderful qualities about this book I  think my favorite was the all around tenderness with which the story is  told. Something about it wears like a comfortable pair of slippers and  is comforting like reuniting with an old friend. I couldn't quite put my finger on it, but I think that you are right in that it is the lovely community of love and acceptance that draws you in. So much understanding exhibited even toward the young German soldiers (the enemy) far from home, or demonstrated by Henry in his story about the prostitutes and their tragic circumstances and deaths and how he reacted to his mother and aunt's comments about it.
I was amused by Juliet's perspective of the relationship with Dawsey. Every woman can relate. In one letter she is sure he's going to kiss her, a couple later she writes "Please ignore everything I have ever said about Dawsey Adams. I am an idiot." She goes on to explain that she doesn't think he's interested at all in her and she feels humiliated.  
I loved some of the entertaining side items:
"Kit would love a bagpipe. I would not."
"Remy, for all she's so frail and thin, manages to look stylish at every turn. What is it about French women?"
"...all the shelves are lined with shells, bird feathers, dried sea grasses, pebbles, egg shells, and the skeleton of something that might be a bat. They're just bits that were lying on the ground, that anyone else would have stepped over or on, but she saw something beautiful in them and brought them home."
I found Dawsey's willingness to don a dishtowel and march around with Kit and Juliet particularly endearing.
Please feel free to drift back into your windbaggery. I'm sure our readers have missed it, as have I! :)
 
 
 

1 comment:
I spent my childhood, sadly in a home without book-lined walls. I was fortunate though to have a grandmother with many books to loan and a library at the end of my street. I too snoop through people's books. My reasons are the combination of the professor's concern of being without a good read, and Madame M's quest to meet the real book owner.
It has taken me a while to catch up with your posts... but now that I have, I am pulling MY copy off the shelf. It is accompanying me on vacation... like traveling with a beloved friend.
Thanks for reminding me;)
Post a Comment