Professor,
This week found me fulfilling the civic duty of serving on a jury. I have a few observations.
This
was my second summons. A few years ago I was chosen to serve on the
jury for a criminal case, that experience took me through the entire
process from jury pool to trial, deliberation, verdict (guilty), then
more deliberation for sentencing. While everyone groaned and complained
about being called, once the jury was chosen I recall that the attitude
changed immediately. People who had made light of the process until then
took the responsibility very seriously and everyone went to great pains
to follow all of the rules to the letter. I have to say it was
impressive how quickly any cavalier attitude about the system
disappeared immediately when it came down to the trial.
No
one seems to like to be notified of their opportunity to serve in this
way. Everyone complains. It means time off work, or away from home, and
in my case the thing that bothered me the most about it was the
requirement to sit for the entire day. Something I am not use to doing.
But I reorganized my phone, deleted old emails, and read Wuthering
Heights. By lunch time the diverse cross section of our city had broken
some of the ice and were getting a bit chattier. Like voting, only more
so, jury duty forces citizens to work together as a group if you are
chosen. If not there is still a benefit from the "we're all in this
together" mindset.
We were shown a video by Supreme
Court Justice Roberts explaining how and why the system works and Sandra
Day O'Connor outlining why the Founders believed in a jury of your
"peers."
Around mid-afternoon we were called to the
courtroom. I was in a group of 12 out of 40 to be questioned first. The
judge determined if we had family members in law enforcement and if we'd
ever been the victim of a crime or if we'd ever been arrested or
convicted. Some of the answers from fellow potential jurors were funny
like the young woman who explained she'd been arrested for having a
"blunt" and thought the justice system had worked well for her since she
didn't go to jail. Then there was the woman whose husband had been
murdered by a 14 year old as part of a gang initiation. He'd received
life in prison without parole, she hesitated when asked if the system
had worked for her and finally said "Given the situation..."
After
that the judge had a little chat with each of us as the microphone was
passed around. I garnered attention for most unusual job with
"beekeeper." Got two orders for honey at the break, one from a Cambodian
man and fairly new citizen who was beaming throughout the day as he
fulfilled his duty as a fellow citizen. I was excused with the rest of
those 12 save 2 and free to go.
When I walked outside I
realized just how miserable having been inside all day had felt.
Particularly in the courtroom where there were no windows but
fluorescent lighting and an atmosphere that was tense. I couldn't help
but wonder if people are making the best decisions possible under those
conditions. One of the great lessons of the day was just how much better
we feel when we get to move and be exposed to natural light.
Advice
for introverts: Take up beekeeping. You never have to think of anything
original to say because you are too busy answering questions in social
settings. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment