Madame M:
First, let me wish you
and all mothers a great Mother’s Day!
Second, let me thank you
for covering for me while overload was upon me.
There is as usual,
entirely SO much that needs to be talked about in just the American landscape,
let alone elsewhere, and that doesn’t even take into consideration all the
points I need to address while you’ve had the soapbox solo the last three
postings! I will try mightily to restrain
and focus in order that some faint measure of brevity can be attained!
To cover a bit of
previous before addressing your recent post:
1) I was not aware we had been “struggling,” but maybe that’s the surest
sign, lol, 2) if we had been, your “Digging For Answers” post came through and bulls-eyed
it superbly (prime exhibit #1: “We ask people to live under impoverished
conditions while pressing their faces up against the glass of wealth and
privilege. Then we just can't imagine what all the anger is about”), 3) The “Digging
For Answers” post needs to be taught nearly verbatim as part of a lesson in a
university social science class, 4) Plan B, the book, listed some correctives
to the disconnection that design of our American cities brings, 5) answer to
your question: Community Policing. It has worked and does work better than
anything when it is implemented earnestly (including when police and citizens
sit down in relaxed and informal settings), and can work (and has worked in
specific instances) in this large country precisely because law enforcement in
America still retains large measures of de-centralization, 6) all efforts at law enforcement reform are
made harder inside a plutocratic political-economy and widespread poverty, 7) how
interesting that the worker bees you illustrate in your Rethink Community post,
the cooperative engines of bee society, are female.
As to your post, I see
we have swung the pendulum to full agreement, and I am sparked to add some
things.
We the undiscerning, mindless robots of tragic
failure, in order to perpetuate a more dysfunctional disunion, foment
injustice, ensure domestic discontent, feed the devouring
military-surveillance-fear-repression consortium, ignore the general Welfare, eviscerate
the environment, and undermine the foundations of Liberty to ourselves and our
descendants, do hereby disestablish preservation, protection, and defense of
the Constitution of 1787 in favor of a vague and misty imaginary one we cannot
articulate but still“know“ is being “threatened” by those we choose as
ideological enemies.
I came up with that
after reading your quite on-target “rant.”
Thomas Frank, born in the heart of America in Kansas City,
has chronicled very well the infuriating and frustrating phenomenon you/we
relate. In his books, The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule;
Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the
Right; and his most famous one, What’s
The Matter With Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America, he
details what has happened. For those who
have not yet read his books, just going to the Wikipedia entry on him will give
you some quotes from them that can be instructive.
Kansas has, in the 10+ years
since he wrote the book, become even a deeper example. It has a governor and legislature so in tune
with ideological extreme (and demonstrated failure) policy that Kansas has gone
into economic and governmental dire straits.
And what was once an educational system that ranked in the top third in
the nation has been shredded.
A plutocratic
political-economy takes three broad groups, and that’s precisely what we
have: 1) The enormously wealthy
individuals and corporations. These are
the true rulers. They are the
plutocrats. 2) Their mouthpieces/shills/politicians
and other paid or sponsored henchmen.
These are the otherwise “powerful” that have been purchased or forced
through money and influence to make the system work for the plutocrats—and to
gum it up so that it can’t work against them.
3) the emotionally manipulated (emotions—often false ones—of fear,
disgruntlement, resentment, anxiety, greed, distrust, racial “preference,”
religious “persecution,” etc.). The
unkind call these low-information voters “suckers” for voting against their
economic and democratic interests, but there is no doubt they are vocal,
demanding, organized—and they vote in droves.
In so doing they perpetuate the plutocracy. And in the process do all—and more—of the
insensible things you list.
Including campaigning
for Mike Huckabee, a man who, while he doesn’t believe in a minimum wage,
believes in a MAXIMUM wage, a limit for those who are EARNING a living. He, of course, being a shill for plutocrats,
says nothing of maximum income. No, no, no.
That would step on the strings of his puppeteers who thrive on carried
interest, dividends, capital gains, and other unearned income.
But there is another
catalyst in this plutocratic setup. The apathetic,
the distracted, the ill-informed, the uncritically thinking, the
diversion-fanatics, the shallow, the willfully ignorant, the uncaring, the
selfish, the overly apolitical, the self-indulgent, and even the despairing and
the disgusted share a common trait.
They rarely show up to
vote, and even then not consistently. Or
even to register. And getting them to be
engaged and retain focus on an issue is usually beyond their capacity.
Thereby giving excessive,
destructive influence to the vocal, demanding, organized quarter of the
population who arm and armor themselves to fight cultural wars while the real
problems slowly devour all of us.
Hey three-quarters, are
you listening?